×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Long Range Transportation Plan 2017

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…

Summary

All Hide

Chapter 1: Introduction

The plan sets a framework for Belgrade’s transportation system, integrating city, county, and state priorities with public input to guide investments. It explains the study area boundaries, covering all of Belgrade and adjacent Gallatin County lands expected to urbanize. The chapter outlines five visionary principles—connectivity, economic vitality, efficiency, quality of life, and safety—supported by seven goals that address preservation, efficiency, land use integration, safety, economic vitality, sustainability, and financial viability. Extensive public involvement included advisory committees, public meetings, online engagement (website, Facebook, interactive mapping), and targeted outreach to stakeholders such as schools, the airport, and emergency services.

Chapter 2: State of the Community

This chapter details current socioeconomic, land use, and transportation conditions. Belgrade’s population has grown rapidly—465% from 1970–2010—with younger demographics and increasing commuter patterns toward Bozeman. Land use is shifting from agricultural to residential and mixed uses, guided by growth policies that encourage compact development. The transportation network includes interstates, arterials, collectors, and local streets, but active transportation facilities remain limited (14.2 miles of bike/ped infrastructure). Transit is provided via the Streamline Greenline Express to Bozeman. Freight and rail are significant due to proximity to I-90, MT-85, and Montana Rail Link, with heavy truck activity concentrated in certain corridors. The airport influences road patterns with proposed relocations in its master plan. Analysis of roadway capacity, intersection performance, and safety identifies congestion points, high crash locations, and active transportation gaps.

Chapter 3: Growth, Travel Forecasts, and Needs

Future growth projections show continued rapid population, housing, and employment increases, with much of the expansion within or near city limits. Travel demand modeling forecasts capacity issues, especially on major corridors, if infrastructure remains unchanged. The plan allocates future growth geographically to anticipate where roadway and multimodal investments will be most needed, emphasizing proactive network planning.

Chapter 4: Improving the System

This chapter provides a suite of recommended improvements, including committed projects, transportation system management (TSM) measures, major street upgrades, and new road connections. Non-motorized network recommendations propose expanding sidewalks, shared-use paths, bike lanes, and bicycle boulevards, as well as addressing specific safety and connectivity gaps. Figures map proposed facilities across the study area.

Chapter 5: Policy and Planning Framework

Policy guidance supports implementation through roadway design standards, travel demand management, maintenance programs, intersection control, traffic calming, development review, and freight considerations. It emphasizes coordination with regional agencies and integrating transportation planning into broader growth policy.

Chapter 6: Implementation and Financial Strategies

Implementation relies on a Visionary Transportation Network map identifying long-term major street and non-motorized corridors. Funding strategies include federal and state programs, local revenue options, impact fees, and partnerships. The chapter stresses prioritization of LRTP projects and balancing system needs with fiscal capacity.

AI Tools

Hide

Welcome to your personal document assistant, powered by AI.

You can ask me questions and I will review the document to provide answers with page references for you. Please be patient, it might take a second and note that I might not always get it right - if you have questions it's easy to check the page sources or contact staff to clarify.

Start with a general question and then follow up with additional questions to narrow the focus of the response if needed.

What would you like to know?

Powered by Konveio